07.27.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 8:58 pm by Administrator
David Rountree
Time Thursday • 9:00pm - 10:00pm
——————————————————————————–
Location www.blogtalkradio.com/paranexus
——————————————————————————–
Created By ParaNexus Assoc
——————————————————————————–
Got a question for David? This program will focus on answering our listeners’ questions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Rountree is the Director of Scientific Paranormal Investigative Research Information and Technology, a paranormal research Laboratory dedicated to the design build of detection and data recording of environmental aspects of paranormal Phenomena, and Co-Director of the New Jersey Paranormal Research Group, and investigative organization which performs investigations and field experimentation.
David has been involved in the paranormal research field since 1976. He is a professional member of the Rhine Research Center, the Audio Engineering Society, The International Frequency Sensor Association, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. David’s background as an audio and acoustic engineer, police officer, and current studies in physics and Quantum Mechanics makes him a vital contributor to the SPIRIT/NJPRG mix. David designs and builds much of the specialized equipment used on investigations with input from other team members. David prides himself in being able to find natural sources for many of the claims they encounter, but has the knowledge and ability to analyze and theorize about the phenomena that defies rational explanations.
David is also a consultant for ParaNexus Anomalous Research Association, Inc.
Permalink
07.13.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 6:18 pm by Administrator
Well, we can’t believe how successful our little podacst has become. Rorke and I have decided that a little background info should be posted to explain why we take the stands we do when discussing the paranormal. Hence, the prequel, Podcast Zero, will be recorded sometime in August when we resume our schedule. Meanwhile, I will post a teaser on the site shortly.
Permalink
05.03.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 12:21 pm by Administrator
As some of you know I make my living as an audio engineer. Below is a link to an article on a system I helped to design and deploy.
http://www.masstransitmag.com/publication/article.jsp?pubId=1&id=11301
Enjoy!
Permalink
04.30.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 12:04 am by Administrator
My latest interview (2 Hours) with my associate Dr. Stephen Rorke is now posted at: http://paratopia.podbean.com/2010/04/29/
You will be entertained and informed. Enjoy! We hit EVP and IYC in a double whammy!
Permalink
04.25.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 8:43 pm by Administrator
Is there something measurable that may explain how mediums and psychics work? Review my experiment at:
http://www.spinvestigations.org/Medium_Experiment.pdf
And see what you think…
Permalink
03.30.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 10:07 pm by Administrator
This is my first commentary on Alex’s “Origin”…
Well, Einstein believed in the Big Crunch. In other words, if there is enough matter in the Universe eventually gravitational forces will stop its expansion. At the point of maximum expansion, gravity will cause the universe to reverse its direction and it will begin to collapse under its own weight. This phase of the Universe’s life is known as the “Big Crunch”.
Eventually, according to Einstein, all of the matter in the Universe will collapse into a super dense state and possibly a massive black hole. Some theorize that the Universe could collapse into the same state that it began as and then blow up in another Big Bang. In this way the Universe would last forever but would continually go through these phases of expansion and contraction, Big Bang and Big Crunch and so on…
In other words, a Einstein believed in a “Closed” universe
Mathematically, if Ω > 1, then the geometry of space is closed like the surface of a sphere. The sum of the angles of a triangle exceeds 180 degrees and there are no parallel lines, therefore all lines eventually meet. The geometry of the universe is, at least on a very large scale, elliptic.
In a closed universe lacking the repulsive effect of dark energy, gravity will theoretically halt the expansion of the universe, after which it starts to contract until all matter in the universe collapses to a point, a final singularity termed the “Big Crunch,” by analogy with Big Bang. However, if the universe has a large amount of dark energy (as suggested by recent findings), then the expansion of the universe can continue forever – even if Ω > 1.
This is why I don’t buy into it. The universe DOES have a large amount of Dark energy. Gravity as a force is far too weak to pull all the mass back in, much less stop the accelerating. Remember, we are not moving forward at the same terminal velocity, we have yet to reach terminal velocity. We are still accelerating away from the big bang event horizon.
But, if the universe does not contain enough matter to stop its expansion it will continue to expand forever.
Using the currently understood laws of physics it is possible to project into the future what the Universe may look like in very distant eras. Two astrophysicists at the University of Michigan have outlined the future history of the Universe.
These guys have divided the future into Eras. The current Era is known as the Stelliferous or Star-Filled era. The state of the Universe is filled with stars and galaxies and planets. This era ends when all the stars have exhausted their fuel and have died leaving behind only remnants of their brilliance.
The next era is known as the Degenerate era. The universe is composed of dead planets, brown dwarfs, white dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes, and some theoretical forms of dark matter. This era ends with the disintegration of all protons, which compose the nuclei of all atoms.
Then the universe enters the Black Hole era. Black holes will be the only gravitationally important objects remaining in the universe. Black holes do not last forever. They will eventually evaporate, radiating away into nothingness.
After that all that will remain is radiation and particles which have an infinite lifetime such as electrons, positrons, and neutrinos. From this point on it is impossible to fathom what will happen as we have reached the limits of our knowledge.
In other words, they propose a scenario called an “Open” universe.
If Ω<1, the geometry of space is open, or negatively curved like the surface of a saddle. The angles of a triangle sum to less than 180 degrees, and lines that do not meet are never equidistant; they have a point of least distance and otherwise grow apart. The geometry of such a universe is hyperbolic.
But even in the absence of dark energy, a negatively curved universe expands forever, with gravity having little effect in slowing the rate of expansion. With dark energy, the expansion not only continues but accelerates, which seems to be our current condition after some 13.6 billion years of existence. The ultimate fate of an open universe as proposed is either universal heat death, the “Big Freeze”, or the “Big Rip,” in which the dark energy inspired acceleration eventually becomes so strong that it completely overwhelms the effects of the gravitational, electromagnetic and weak binding forces. I have issues with this scenario as well.
On the other hand, a negative cosmological constant, which would correspond to a negative energy density and positive pressure, would cause even an open universe to recollapse to a big crunch. This has been ruled out by recent observations. But there are aspects of all of this that remain problematic.
Another theory is the Flat universe…
If the average density of the universe equals the critical density so that Ω=1, then the geometry of the universe is flat: as in Euclidean geometry, the sum of the angles of a triangle is 180 degrees and parallel lines continuously maintain the same distance.
Absent of dark energy, a flat universe expands forever but at a continually decelerating rate, with expansion asymptotically approaching a fixed rate. With dark energy, the expansion rate of the universe initially slows down, due to the effect of gravity, but eventually increases. The ultimate fate of the universe is the same as an open universe. I don’t buy into this either, as current observations cast doubt on this.
So what is the nature of the universe?
There are actually many theories about the end of universe, and that fate will be determined by the density of the universe. The preponderance of evidence to date, based on measurements of the rate of expansion and the mass density, favors a universe that will continue to expand indefinitely, resulting in the “big freeze” scenario.
The Big Freeze or Heat death
The Big Freeze is a scenario under which continued expansion results in a universe that asymptotically approaches absolute zero temperature. It could, in the absence of dark energy, occur only under a flat or hyperbolic geometry. With a positive cosmological constant, it could also occur in a closed universe. This scenario is currently the most commonly accepted theory within the scientific community. A related scenario is Heat death, which states that the universe goes to a state of maximum entropy in which everything is evenly distributed, and there are no gradients — which are needed to sustain information processing, one form of which is life. The Heat Death scenario is compatible with any of the three spatial models, but requires that the universe reach an eventual temperature minimum. While this is getting a lot of juice now among astrophysicists, I have issues with it as well.
The Big Rip: Finite Lifespan
In the special case of phantom dark energy, which has even more negative pressure than a simple cosmological constant, the density of dark energy increases with time, causing the rate of acceleration to increase, leading to a steady increase in the Hubble constant. As a result, all material objects in the universe, starting with galaxies and eventually (in a finite time) all forms, no matter how small, will disintegrate into unbound elementary particles and radiation, ripped apart by the phantom energy force and shooting apart from each other. The end state of the universe is a singularity, as the dark energy density and expansion rate becomes infinite. While on the surface this makes sense, it too is problematic.
The Big Crunch
The Big Crunch theory is a symmetric view of the ultimate fate of the universe. Just as the Big Bang started a cosmological expansion, this theory postulates that the average density of the universe is enough to stop its expansion and begin contracting. The end result is unknown; a simple extrapolation would have all the matter and space-time in the universe collapse into a dimensionless singularity, but at these scales unknown quantum effects need to be considered such as Quantum Gravity.
This scenario allows the Big Bang to have been immediately preceded by the Big Crunch of a preceding universe. If this occurs repeatedly, we have an oscillatory universe. The universe could then consist of an infinite sequence of finite universes, each finite universe ending with a Big Crunch that is also the Big Bang of the next universe. Theoretically, the oscillating universe could not be reconciled with the second law of thermodynamics: entropy would build up from oscillation to oscillation and cause heat death. Other measurements suggested the universe is not closed. These arguments caused cosmologists to abandon the oscillating universe model. A somewhat similar idea is embraced by the cyclic model, but this idea evades heat death, because of an expansion of the branes that dilutes entropy accumulated in the previous cycle. While I don’t believe the Universe is oscillating, I believe the multiverse does. The multiverse oscilates and the universes are small subcarriers floating on the quantum wave, like the static surfboard.
Big Bounce
The Big Bounce is a theorized scientific model related to the beginning of the known Universe. It derives from the oscillatory universe or cyclic repetition interpretation of the Big Bang where the first cosmological event was the result of the collapse of a previous universe.
According to one version of the Big Bang theory of cosmology, in the beginning the universe had infinite density. Such a description seems to be at odds with everything else in physics, and especially quantum mechanics and its uncertainty principle. It is not surprising, therefore, that quantum mechanics has given rise to an alternative version of the Big Bang theory. Also, if the universe is closed, this theory would predict that once this universe collapses it will spawn another universe in an event similar to the Big Bang after a universal singularity is reached or a repulsive quantum force causes re-expansion. While this has merit, it is still incomplete.
The False vacuum
If the vacuum is not in its lowest energy state (a false vacuum), it could tunnel into a lower energy state. This is called the vacuum metastability event. This has the potential to fundamentally alter our universe; in more audacious scenarios even the various physical constants could have different values, severely affecting the foundations of matter, energy, and spacetime. It is also possible that all structures will be destroyed instantaneously, without any forewarning. I have issues with this as well.
Cosmic uncertainty
Each possibility described so far is based on a very simple form for the dark energy equation of state. But as the name is meant to imply, we know almost nothing of the real physics of the dark energy. If the theory of inflation is true, the universe went through an episode dominated by a different form of dark energy in the first moments of the big bang; but inflation ended, indicating an equation of state much more complicated than those assumed so far for present-day dark energy. It is possible that the dark energy equation of state could change again resulting in an event that would have consequences which are extremely difficult to parametrize or predict. It is also possible the universe may never have an end and continue in its present state forever.
Choosing among these rival scenarios is done by ‘weighing’ the universe, for example, measuring the relative contributions of matter, radiation, dark matter and dark energy to the critical density. More concretely, competing scenarios are evaluated against data on galaxy clustering and distant supernovae, and on the anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background.
So what do I believe?
I believe in the Multiverse.
I believe that once the fuse was lit, there is no complete end.
My multiverse hypothesis states that our universe is merely one Big Bang among an infinite number of simultaneously expanding Big Bangs that are spread out over endless distances. Each universe may be either matter or antimatter, with an equal number in existence at any given time. As the universes each expand away from their individual event horizons they collide and matter and antimatter annihilate, releasing energy. Heat death of a finite universe would be predicted as entropy increases; however, the infinite size of the multiverse and its oscillation coupled with the infinite number of universes could mean that new ones would be formed as old ones were annihilated.
Think of it as a chain reaction multiverse, much like the finale at a fireworks display with each explosion being symbolic of a Big Bang. It begins in one neighborhood and is followed by fireworks displays in surrounding neighborhoods and then in neighborhoods further out. The chain reaction of Big Bangs would continue to expand as Big Bang fuel is consumed. If the multiverse is open and the fuel is infinite then the chain reaction would expand forever. Of course, it is not known what the “fuel” is, (I believe it is the Zero Point Energy Field) but it is logical to assume that matter and energy are the product of a transformation from a real reactant, possibly the Higgs boson. While I tend to think they won’t discover the Higgs Boson, there will be a settlement on something called the Higgs Boson Effect if the Higgs Boson is not discovered.
By my reckoning, the multiverse as a whole will never end completely. But this is just a part of the equation. We have to add in the Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. As such, each time a quantum event happens that causes the universe to decay from a false vacuum to a true vacuum state, the universe splits into several new worlds. In some of the new worlds the universe decays; in some others the universe continues as before. I believe that both of these theories are part of the same theory. One is entangled with the other creating many reactions relating to the whole.
Recent work in inflationary cosmology, string theory, and quantum mechanics has moved the discussion of the ultimate fate of the universe in directions distinct from the scenarios set out by some of the other theories. Theoretical work by Eric Chaisson and David Layzer suggest that an expanding spacetime gives rise to an increasing “entropy gap”, casting further doubt on the heat death hypothesis. Invoking Ilya Prigogine’s work on far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics, their analysis suggests that this entropy gap may contribute to information, and hence to the formation of structure. Hence the Information Theory may be a part of the TOE, or Theory of Everything. Add to this aspects of the Holographic principle. The holographic principle is a property of quantum gravity and string theories which states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a boundary to the region, preferably a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon. First proposed by Gerard ‘t Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susskind.
In a larger and more speculative sense, the theory suggests that the entire universe can be seen as a two-dimensional information structure “painted” on the cosmological horizon, such that the three dimensions we observe are only an effective description at macroscopic scales and at low energies. Cosmological holography has not been made mathematically precise, partly because the cosmological horizon has a finite area and grows with time.
The holographic principle was inspired by black hole thermodynamics, which implies that the maximal entropy in any region scales with the radius squared, and not cubed as might be expected. In the case of a black hole, the insight was that the description of all the objects which have fallen in can be entirely contained in surface fluctuations of the event horizon. The holographic principle resolves the black hole information paradox within the framework of string theory. All of these play a part in the grand scheme of the Multiverse.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Andrei Linde, Alan Guth, Ted Harrison, and Ernest Sternglass argued that inflationary cosmology strongly suggests the presence of a Multiverse, (Amen!) and that it would be practical even with today’s knowledge for intelligent beings to generate and transmit de novo information into a distinct universe. Alan Guth has speculated that a civilization at the top of the Kardashev scale might create fine-tuned universes in a continuation of the evolutionary drive to exist, grow, and multiply. This has been further developed by the Selfish Biocosm Hypothesis, and by the proposal that the existence of the fundamental physical constants may be subject to a Darwinian evolution of Universes. Moreover, recent theoretical work on the unresolved quantum gravity problem and the Holographic Principle suggests that traditional physical quantities may possibly themselves be describable in terms of exchanges of information, which in turn raises questions about the applicability of older cosmological models.
And this may just hold the secret to paranormal activity…
So, in a nutshell, this is why I believe that the Universe will go on forever in some fashion or form.
But then I may be wrong. I have been before….LOL
Permalink
Posted in Uncategorized at 7:02 pm by Administrator
My friend, Alex Reynolds has written an outstanding paper on the omniverse, called “Origin” (Dedicated to Plato and the wisdom of the ancients, from whom the multiverse idea originated)
I plan to write a commentary on it, but first I would like some feed back from the peanut gallery.
http://spinvestigations.org/Origins.pdf
Enjoy!
Permalink
03.02.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 9:11 am by Administrator
The entire subject of shadow people is both fascinating and controversial. To date, science has offered little in the way of an explanation for the reported phenomenon, other than the standard responses they have for any paranormal phenomena, which is in my opinion a cop out. The official hypotheses are:
1. Pareidolia
In most instances, witnesses report seeing shadow people in the peripheral areas of their vision. This area of vision is linked to the areas of the brain that recognizes patterns, however it provides less detail to the brain than macular (center-forward) vision. This can lead to a condition known as pareidolia, in which the brain incorrectly interprets random patterns of light/shadow or texture as being familiar patterns such as faces and human forms. The same condition can also be observed in macular vision in low light conditions, or when viewing a complex but random image. A common example would be perceiving a shadow, thrown by an item of furniture in a darkened room, as being a person.
On the other hand, our peripheral vision is also very sensitive to the invisible light spectrum. Our perception of Infrared and Ultraviolet occur in this area of vision. Is this a factor?
2. Hypnagogia
Also known as waking-sleep, hypnagogia is a documented physiological condition in which a person is part-way between sleeping and waking. During hypnagogia, a person can be conscious and aware of their environment, but also in a dream-like state where they can perceive images from their subconscious. People experiencing waking-sleep commonly report the sensation of lights or shadows moving around them, as well as other visual hallucinations. A feeling of dread is also a sensation that occurs when experiencing hypnagogia. Hypnagogia is sometimes known as ‘the faces in the dark phenomenon’ because those who experience this state commonly report seeing faces while experiencing waking-sleep. Similar hypotheses have been put forward linking this condition to a number of other apparent paranormal experiences, including alien abductions, paranormal nocturnal visitations, and religious experiences such as contact with angels or demons.
Additionally, this condition has been used as a catch all solution to UFO/Alien abductions, Sleep paralysis, and other paranormal related phenomena. While this may be the case in some instances, it certainly isn’t the case in all.
3. Chemical agents
The use of narcotics and psychotropic agents, including methamphetamine, cocaine, MDMA (Ecstasy) and LSD, can produce shadow human shaped hallucinations. Dopaminergic drugs such as pramipexole can sometimes cause these hallucinations. Common over-the-counter medication can also have a similar effect if taken in overdose (see diphenhydramine).
While I have seen this statement made repeatedly I have never seen any data whatsoever to back this up. In my opinion this is pure conjecture.
4. Electromagnetic fields
Demonstrated in laboratory conditions, electromagnetic fields have been demonstrated to interfere with the functions of the temporal lobe; creating altered states of perception in which auditory and visual hallucinations can occur.
A second example of recreating this phenomenon in a laboratory setting, researchers used electromagnetic fields to recreate many of the experiences reported during paranormal encounters including those of shadow people. Researchers have also documented correlations between variances in naturally-occurring magnetic fields and areas where paranormal events have been reported.
The primary source for this is of course the study performed by Dr. Michael Persinger in his God Helmet experiment. The issue here is these EMF waves were of a specific frequency to trigger specific effects, and were stimulating the brain via a very close proximity using an electrode. While this works in a lab, it is not a condition encountered in the field. To penetrate the skull, EMF has to be very intense, which would be an environmental anomaly also worth investigating for source. Since nearly all background EMF is in the 60 Hz range, and 60 Hz EMF is not associated with visual stimulation that creates hallucinations of shadow people, another source for the EMF needs to be identified. If that fails, then we have a deeper mystery. But back to Persinger, his work needs to be duplicated far more before we accept this as a norm and not an artifact. Studies do indicate that 1 in 3 people have a sensitivity to certain frequencies of EMF, but again, this would not explain all occurances.
5. Neurological conditions
Certain neurological conditions, such as photosensitive complex partial seizures and Dementia with Lewy bodies, have also been known to cause sufferers to see shadow people.
Again, this is a nice explanation, but not a realistic one. So what is a shadow person?
Folklore tells us about a number of paranormal beliefs for shadow people that have been drawn from various religions, parapsychology, metaphysics, demonology, and the occult. These include:
1. Specters
One proposal is that Shadow People represent a Thought form (egregore), ghost or demon that was created by events in which extreme physical/emotional stress/trauma has taken place, or which have been purposefully summoned through black magic or other occult practices. It has also been claimed by many paranormal pundits that they are unattended shadows or shades, said in some cultures to be similar to that of a ghost: a flicker of a life unable to end for some reason.
This may be true but we will have to prove it.
2. Interdimensional
A second belief is that they are creatures from another reality whose “dimension” occasionally overlaps with ours, allowing them to be partially visible, or that they represent creatures that exist on a separate plane of existence.
Based on my own research this line of thinking has the most validity if a shadow person turns out to be a being or entity. Again, we will have to prove this.
3. UFO
A third belief is that they are in some way related to Grey aliens, or to the Reptilian humanoids found in conspiracy beliefs such as those promoted by David Icke and others.
Again there is no proof. So I decided to determine what could cause the phenomena scientifically, and I stumbled upon an interesting concept. This concept involves the sub-atomic particle known as the “anti-photon”. My jorney took me through several lively conversations with physicists and other scientists from various yahoo physics groups on the web. Let me share some of the conversations. I will use only first names to protect identities.
My questions are in bold, with reposnses.
“This may seem odd, but since a photon is associated with light energy, is
there a corresponding opposite particle, that would be associated with a
lack of light, or even darkness? Perhaps a particle that cancels light?”
Here is what I got back:
“This could be the antiphoton.
The antiphoton is also a photon, exhibiting right handed spin, going the opposite way. There is no real left landed light in this world, but it would be present as exchange of momentum between positrons in a world of antimatter, where it would be the light, not darkness. In this world it would in theory cancel right handed light of equal frequency, annihilating the state space they animated. But in a trick of time, by exhibiting change, as I understand it, the resulting implosion will generate equal energy right handed photons from the right handed vacuum energy filling the gap. We see this happen in effect in electron positron interaction, which when interacting over a distance, is equivalent to right handed light and left handed antilight interaction. The cancellation results in a contraction of local spacetime that exhibits our notion of attraction and the other half of how handedness exhibits charge. Repulsion of like spins, and hence like charge, is by discrete expansion of local space time by instantiating independent state exhibiting photon exchange of momentum away, not fundamental by the magical influence at a distance on everything in the universe ordinarily associated with the notion of charge.”
-Jim-
Upon which I replied:
This is what I suspected, that there was an anti-photon.
Then I received:
“Remember that what is ordinarily called the antiphoton is just another
right handed photon. You may hear often that a photon is its own anti
particle.
But there is also the notion of the left handed photon, which is a
true antiparticle as it has opposite spin.”
-Jim-
“The question is does it cause an annihilation when contacting a photon of equal but opposite spin?
Opposite spin always cancels. In one sense that is all that happens
fundamentally in the quantum. The trick is that change propagates so
energy is often not always lost by such annihilation and may be in
effect doubled, conserving energy on average relative to a global
perspective.”
-Jim-
“Also, can a group of anti-photons co-exist in an environment without causing an annihilation if it does not encounter photons of equal spin?
We call momentum exchange between electrons photon exchanges, and we can call left handed anti photons exchange of momentum between positrons, these can coexist in space and do not necessarily annihilate. Since our world of matter is exhibited predominantly by electrons rather than positrons, annihilation of left handed light by electron interaction seems highly probable. However, when we see repulsion of two positive charges we are witnessing what is in effect, momentum exchange by exchange of left handed photons.”
-Jim-
You are helping me a great deal here. I will tell you why I am fishing here. I photographed a phenomenon commonly referred to as a shadow person. It is essentially a man-sized shadow of a person, but it is really more like a total absence of light. I believe the reason for this phenomenon is due to a quantum singularity of sorts, and I am trying to determine what it really may be. It occurs to me that a collection of anti-photons may be the culprit. On the other hand, there are still many unanswered questions, but it is a start.
“You may be on to the Dark force here, if we can measure it, it is more than a mere memeion, it has high energy, and great power.
In our manifest information ecology the dark force prunes, such that it may bloom. Much is in the memeion realm, efficiently propagating the meme supply chain, on every imaginable communication channel, chemical, biological, mental with interactions relatively between layers exhibiting reciprocal relations indirectly, mostly undiscovered.
Quantum spin is not turning around at all but seeming to have turned around in both directions to have ended up facing the same way, in a punctuated existence, exhibited only at full cycles, without substance between repetitions of meme propagation.
I consider particles to be memeions as subatomic particles are without independent substance intermittently exhibited as a pattern in the surrounding logical action, and because all particles and objects in this world instantiate a memeion translator or repeater in the information universe.
It would be very cool if the dark force was directly measurable in the visible light frequency. There are so many ways we experience the dark force, many of them very good, tough love. Creation and destruction go hand in hand in the construction of the machinery of our memetic world. Creation is always favored in the ecology since what exists is what repeats. Science is about what is repeatable. Memes are about patterns that repeat and transform as is existence itself.
Bi local quantum events happen on every scale and are apparently all that is happening in a realm where all levels of memetic interaction interact with each other in twisted hierarchies of control which can account for psychokinetic action as memetic, mental kinetic logical process. .Even the electron turns out to be nothing more than a meme we associate with a pattern of logical extression that repeats intermittently in a quantum logical system.
Saying left handed photons are a way of understanding the physical action of the dark force in our right handed world is valid. Left handed antimater action is our undoing in the world of matter. But to understand how it happens we can forget the photons as there are only perception of momentum exchanges we call photons as a cancelling, doubling, or conservation of action that is both logical and physically manifest. We need to consider the participants.
We might have a darkness of reflected light like a shadow, where antilight is directed by a directed listening for it. Or it could be like a resonance in space causing the migration of positrons to an object like region of space acting as anti muon memeons resulting in entropy of space time intervals in the visible light range.
I am not confident you will find the dark force in the visible range. Nature is always surprising in the channels it uses. It does not oblige us by using what we might expect. I believe mental and chemical effects of the dark force provide sufficient in mechanism at much lower energies accounts for experience. My own psychokinetic experiments to the contrary were as if there was a conspiracy of our collective mind making measurement of such effects taboo, contradicting our subjective experience of it. I don’t really believe the conspiracy theories; I think it is just constructed in surprising ways we have not imagined yet, at more efficient, lower energies, with more redundancy than it appears on first analysis.
The physical universe apparently has a collective quantum logical nature. Science models nature as a machine and that machine apparently has a discrete logical, memetic nature where memetic realms interact in collectively determining reality. It is equivalently an information system, more specifically an ecology of information.”
-Jim-
“I have thought about that possibility as an explanation for dark matter being antimatter and having antiphotons in its space. I still think this can be a right solution but it could be not so simple because light is additive and even getting null like in interferences it reappears afterwards. I believe what can cancel light is a strong magnetic field with the opposite spin.
Regards”
Globus
“Information loss in quantum systems is local to a system. Globally quantum action is never really lost and is purely additive by its synthesis. But decay, and entropy of a quantum system is what is expected to be experienced.
Antimater in our world might tend to have local entropy or darkening resulting from annihilations, but lots of ordinary light can also result.
A simpler explanation of dark matter is the effectively higher energy density, and hence greater mass, of the vacuum energy in the vicinity of mass due to space time warping.”
-Jim-
“I believe what can cancel light is a strong magnetic field with the opposite spin.”
-J-
“Pseudo left handed light is created with strong magnetic fields. Indirectly these could produce a darkening effect. But remember that a strong magnetic field is just what we call the effect of an inbalance in the number of up and down electrons and there is synthesis of space time at different rates in different directions as only like spins interact.
The whole system creates as much space time intervals as are destroyed. The destruction, or quantum logical contraction of twisted spacetime intervals is apparent in the attraction we see between opposite up/down orientation magnetic poles. The handedness, left/right is independent of up/down orientation and is not really canceled in a magnetic field, it is simply allowed to a lesser or greater extent by allowed interactions of like orientation. But the view that it is canceled in parts of the system cannot be said to be wrong.”
-Jim-
“Hi David,
It is not such a daft question as it sounds. According to Newton there should be an opposite reaction not just possible but evident. I get around this problem by uses two phases for a light photon with my F wave. In the 3D phase it acts as a real 3D particle (putting aside wave/matter duality for now) and in the 4D phase it acts as a real 4D particle. However I go a bit farther than this and say that anti particles are really those existing in 4D. The more they are shunted into 4D the more anti particle properties they exhibit.
Yours sincerely,”
-Alex-
I am leaning more towards a frequency perspective than a phase perspective. I am not sure phasing results in any significant factor.
“Hi David,
This is another feature of light that you have noticed!
It never seems to be out of phase. Even when bent around a massive star it eventually corrects itself.
I believe the answer to this is given by describing the cubic expansion of light in Newton’s cube.
To travel from corner to corner you need to travel at square root of 2 times the speed of light and the square root of 3 times c going from opposite corners of the cube.
I think I designed the Fwave as 1D light in 2D as 2F1. What matters really is that the F wave does elongate as we go above the speed of light. At the same time it reduces in amplitude so exactly the same work is done for one phase!
With my assertion that there is a restitution of space and time it seems obvious to me that the interaction of F waves or light will create a combination as for normal waveforms (eg water).
Light is further constricted by the properties of our 3D that exert an upper bound on the speed of light albeit that it acts as an inter dimensional force between 3D and 4D.
Now if we consider two opposing lights rays they don’t cancel each other. Fwaves for an electron would act like this.
Perhaps (I have not considered this before) the reason for this disparity is that the light photon is constantly acting as a form of energy that converts to mass and back to energy continually.
The chances of two light rays hitting each other in 3D at the peak of their phase is extremely unlikely.
Even if they did light spreads out so only the light at the centre line of the two light cones would cancel.
As far as I know this is the first explanation for this phenomenon.
Yours sincerely,”
Alex
“So what else is vital here? What happens when a photon and an antiphoton collide?
The two annihilate. A gamma ray is released.”
-Dim-
I think about a tx-plane of Minkowski’s space in which a photon moves (in the direction of increasing x). Time will also increase (the positive direction of t-axis). The Minkowski space is an R-invariant for electromagnetic phenomena occurring within it. Math-wise, R=PT (the relativistic reflection) 4-inversion, P is the space reflection, and T is the inversion (sign change) of time. Consequently due to the R-reflection, the directions of all axes are reversed, and time for photon subsequently flows backward. This would be the antiparticle property (I believe according to Stueckelberg-Feynman-Strel’tsov interpretation). This adequately demonstrates the negative energy of antiparticles.
This would be a clear indication of an antiphoton! As per Jim, he points out another vital difference between the photon and antiphoton. If the photon spin is directed along the momentum (the helicity λ=+1), then AFTER reflection, the momentum direction reverses but the spin direction (as an axial vector) does not change, in other words the helicity changes (λ=-1), then the distinctive observed difference of an antiphoton versus a photon would be the opposite sign of helicity, correct? I make this assumption based on the fact that an antineutrino is different from a neutrino. The lepton charge of the neutrino of course masks the fact that for massless particles the helicity sign is the indicator of antiparticle or particle.
May I then assume that the same valid reasoning can be applied to the photon analogues such as the graviton and the gluons (the quanta of gravitational and nuclear fields)? If the antigraviton differs from the graviton by the helicity sign only, then the antigluons can be distinguished from the corresponding gluons by the opposite “color charge”.
Or am I completely missing the point?
I think I lost everyone after that one. Everyone except Alex that is….
“Hi David,
I find it hard to dispute what you are saying. I note that Minkowski space is an R-invariant. This is similar to my saying that the 3D and 4D phases use exactly the same amount of energy. I don’t dispute that things work in reverse the direction of a ray of light does not effect its action. What we are looking for is cancellation.
I don’t believe that this exists. If we have two lamps turned on the light directly between them does not cancel; even if we allow for phase offsetting by moving them apart.
I suppose this can lead us to suggest that two light sources act to combine their
total output as if they were a single source. It is not easy at all to answer why this is so. Your finding about the change in helicity as it changes (ë=-1) reminds me of the orthogonal change between 3D and 4D phases of my F wave. Perhaps I am thinking about this all the wrong way? Let me put forward a suggestion off the top of my head…
I had presumed that at the peak of the photon’s 4D phase it consists
entirely of matter (and so too the anti-photon). Is it possible to have an anti-photon that is totally energy at this point in the phase? I suppose so but it would not traverse into 3D at the end of the 4D phase.
Unless of course I am missing something (assuming anti-photons exist).
Idea!
It would not be 100% matter at this point but 100% anti-matter so the possibility of crossing the 3D/4D boundary could exist. So I am not saying that anti-photons exist but I think they could do at least theoretically. Explaining this against observed behavior is problematic though.
Yours sincerely,”
Alex
Ok, so after all of this mumbo-jumbo quanta talk, what does it all mean?
It means the effect of what we call a shadow person may be able to be measured. While I have dismissed the cluster of dark particles known as anti-photons to be a possible cause via thought experiments, (anti-photons are a form of anti-matter, and may be the result of an interaction between time, space and a parallel universe, but would cause a very violent explosion if the encapsulating magnetic field failed) but I do believe there is a particle that absorbs light involved, and this too could also be the result of an interaction between time, space and a parallel universe . It would go far to explain why we measure Gamma radiation spikes in the proximity of this type of phenomena.
But either way, it reveals hope. If we can measure it, we can prove what it is.
Permalink
01.11.10
Posted in Uncategorized at 10:42 pm by Administrator
http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/newbay/scn_201001/#/34
Permalink
09.16.09
Posted in Uncategorized at 9:03 pm by Administrator
Dangerous Knowledge Attached is a film about something we should all pay attention to. Settle back, get some popcorn and enjoy….
Permalink
« Previous entries
